RSS Feed Visit our Tumblr blog Visit us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Write us an emailDonate to SPARK!

Predictable Sexism In Birth Control

by Stephanie Cole

Sometimes, I am unpleasantly surprised when blatant sexism pops up in unexpected places. There are, however, issues where I can always expect to see an unfortunate display of ignorance and sexism.

Women’s health is one of these issues. Bring up menstruation, female sexuality, and female anatomy anywhere without a guaranteed population of feminists, and prepare to hear something infuriating.  Get politics into the mess, and expect even worse. I was delighted when news regarding new legislation regarding women’s health broke this week, and while some of the political and media reactions were expected, I still feel the need to point them out so that we can continue to be aware of the opinions that we are up against.

To summarize, it was recently announced that as part of national health care reform, insurance companies will be required to completely cover expenses for birth control and other women-specific health expenses. This being a component of so called “Obama-care,” of course Fox news was heavily intent on discrediting it.

I am not trying to be too partisan here, but I am hoping that no matter where you fall on the political spectrum, you can recognize sexism when it appears and agree that it has no place in any political discourse. And many arguments presented reeked of old, offensive stereotypes. Do yourself a favor, and catch up on some examples through the lens of Stephen Colbert, whose perfect commentary will at least keep you from getting too upset.

In the excerpted arguments, we have examples of almost every ugly stereotype regarding a woman’s sexual health. Rep. Steve King of Iowa expresses the good old-fashioned idea that contraception is the equivalent of generational genocide–as if women have sex for no reason other than to have children. Well, I guess that’s us, with our naïve, impressionable lady brains. Wave a free Nuva Ring in front of our face, and we will immediately forget that we may actually want a family someday. And of course every woman who takes birth control is committed for life.

And then, there is the opinion expressed by a pundit who is, illogically, herself a woman. She gets all anti-female sexuality with the common argument that birth control is a moral threat because it encourages a woman’s sexual freedom. Colbert does a good job highlighting that her insinuation that contraception turns an otherwise normal woman into a sex crazed maniac is ridiculous. But I have something I would like to add: The pundit asks “Why in the world would you want to encourage your daughters, your granddaughters….to have unrestricted, unlimited sex.” My answer: Why not? All that this describes is a women having sex on her own terms, but of course, it is presented as the height of immorality. The reality is that birth control does allow women to freely express their sexuality, and there is NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.

I would happily call this legislation a victory for women’s health, and I look forward to when it goes into effect next year.  But I also hope that some of these reactions will remind us that stereotypes about women’s health and sexuality still prevail. We need to always be reminded that women are still patronized and that sexist views of our health still go unquestioned. If we do not continue to call out sexist attitudes–however predictable they may be–then we are unlikely to ever see positive change.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Predictable Sexism In Birth Control”

  1. Teek says:

    The reality is that Republicans should adore birth control. An unplanned pregnancy has great potential for long-term state expenses. Aside from the ignorant (and, I’m sorry, hateful) mindset about what freedoms any individual should have regardless of sex or gender, there is even an economic incentive behind family planning. Republicans should think of it as an investment.

    Of course, that’s impossible because this is campaign season, and we all should realise what that means to a politician: Pandering. Lots of it, and from both sides.

    I am sorry for even suggesting that there needs to be an economic justification for this legislation, as if individual liberty is not enough, but Republicans these days are so far from the party’s core ideals that it is ridiculous. Providing birth control will -potentially, I will use a disclaimer- lessen the role of government in people’s lives, not increase their reliance on even more expensive programs.

    Thanks for the article, Stephanie, and for your objective analysis of the candidates’ and media’s reactions. Fox News makes itself an easy target, seriously.

    Also, the editing on the article needs a bit more careful attention. :D A lovely read, though!


Leave a Reply